<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>i.mel.dific &#187; accessory for less</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imeldificcity.com/category/accessory-for-less/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imeldificcity.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chanel VS UrbanOutfitters</title>
		<link>http://www.imeldificcity.com/2008/11/chanel-vs-urbanoutfitters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imeldificcity.com/2008/11/chanel-vs-urbanoutfitters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>i.mel.dific</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accessory for less]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monochrome tights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UrbanOutfitters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imeldificcity.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not actually featuring a shoe for less for this post but an accessory/tights for less. On the left is Chanel&#8216;s (two-toned) Monochrome tights worth £190.00. This tights was introduced during Paris Fashion Week for Autumn-Winter 2008-2009 and is currently making a statement for this season. On the right is UrbanOutfitters&#8217; Either Or tights [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_696" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 460px"><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-696\" href="http://www.imeldificcity.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5pbWVsZGlmaWNjaXR5LmNvbS8yMDA4LzExL2NoYW5lbC12cy11cmJhbm91dGZpdHRlcnMvdGlnaHRzLw=="><img class="size-full wp-image-696" style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 5px;" title="tights" src="http://www.imeldificcity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/tights.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="332" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo courtesy of Vogue.co.uk (left) and UrbanOutfitters.com (right)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">I am not actually featuring a shoe for less for this post but an accessory/tights for less.</p>
<p>On the left is <strong>Chanel</strong>&#8216;s (two-toned) <strong>Monochrome tights</strong> worth £190.00.  This tights was introduced during Paris Fashion Week for Autumn-Winter 2008-2009 and is currently making a statement for this season.</p>
<p>On the right is <strong>UrbanOutfitters&#8217; Either Or tights</strong> worth $14.00.</p>
<p>Few get successful with imitating designer products and if you look deeper, expensive products are highly known and expected to have a better quality compared to cheaper brands.</p>
<p>For me, I always believe that it&#8217;s how you wear or carry an item yourself whether it is brand less or a designer product.  Having expensive items will not necessarily make you classy or fashionable all the time and vise versa.</p>
 <img src="http://www.imeldificcity.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=695" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imeldificcity.com/2008/11/chanel-vs-urbanoutfitters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

